“Do you need a Ph.D. for that?”

As a recent Ph.D.-graduate-turned-high-school-teacher, I am constantly fielding questions about my transition. These come from my former graduate student friends, my current colleagues and even a few from my students. People seem shockingly interested in why someone would give up the “glamorous” research life to be around adolescents all day. Here are a few of the most common:

Do you need a Ph.D. to teach high school?

Nope. I’ve actually heard that it can be detrimental when searching for a job in some public school districts that are required to pay higher salaries to Ph.D. holders. My private school (thankfully??) isn’t constrained by these restrictions. However, in my limited interactions with other Ph.D.s turned K-12 teachers, private schools do tend to value the expertise associated with highly specialized degrees.

I do often find myself thankful for my Ph.D. training. It allows me to talk to my students with a level of authority not typically granted to other members of my department (by either students or parents). When I tell them, “researchers haven’t figured that part out yet,” they usually believe me. They don’t seem to be thinking “you don’t actually know the answer, do you?” I have no problem pulling off bacterial transformation labs or gel electrophoresis labs. So in many ways, I’ve found that my Ph.D. training (and degree title) have made being a teacher easier.

Do you miss science?

Not at all. In fact, in some ways I feel more integrated with science as an overall disciple when compared to my days cloning (and recloning… and recloning) in the lab. I spend most of my day talking about the really cool parts of biology. My AP Biology course is starting the fall with a unit on microRNAs. I go on frequent research lab tours with a senior level research class. My Science Olympiad (https://www.soinc.org) team recently won a competition by building an accurate 3D model of a TALEN protein, complete with amino acid side chains in the catalytic site. As I teach, I also am forced to relearn plant and ecosystem biology, disciplines previously relegated to the unreachable areas of my memory. This summer, I’ve spent lots of time with my energetic toddler—while she naps, I edit scientific manuscripts written by non-native English speakers. So I usually don’t feel like I’ve left science at all.

What do you miss about the lab?

I seriously miss the flexibility. I’ve never been good at sleeping in, so when I was in the lab, I always worked regular hours. But if I needed to go to the dentist or head home with a migraine, I could. Now, according to my contract, I have to be at school from 7:30-3:30 (but am usually there longer), with limited exceptions. Of course, if I need to stay home with my sick daughter, I can; however, I have to get a sub, write sub plans and make sure I keep a very close eye on my email. In general, this doesn’t bother me. But when I was breastfeeding my daughter, I was highly frustrated by the 10 minute breaks between classes.

Could you go back and do a postdoc, if you wanted? (I get this question mainly from my educator colleagues)

I’m not sure. I don’t think so. Technology changes so quickly in biomedical research, that I think it would be challenging to return to the lab after a long hiatus. That being said, I’m not sure I’ll be away from academia forever. Long term, I can envision myself going into a university-affiliated science outreach position.

What has been the hardest thing about your transition?

            In some ways, I feel like a big, fat copout. I spent a lot of time in graduate school advocating for women’s issues in science. I was, and remain, passionate about retention of women in scientific disciplines. Even now, I feel strongly that institutional policies need to change to support the success of women at all levels. So when I take a step back and look at my professional biography, I am dismayed to see a well-funded, well-published graduate student that has left research to pursue a career in a historically female dominated field with mediocre pay. When I start to feel this way, my hugely supportive husband gently reminds me that I am still advancing the careers of women, as a well-educated women science teacher at an all-female school. In an effort to fight the negative feeling that sometimes surface, I aim to be the very best teacher I can be.

Do you regret your Ph.D.? (I usually find myself asking this question, after a particularly hard day)

            I hope that in 10 years, when I revisit my professional biography, there will be some obvious purpose to my 5+ years spent in graduate school. I hope that my training will have improved my teaching in a clear and tangible way. For now, I try to put this question out of my mind. And when students come to me interested in biomedical science, I encourage them to consider biomedical engineering.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in female scientist and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to “Do you need a Ph.D. for that?”

  1. StrongerThanFiction says:

    Your job sounds so fun! That is awesome that you have a science Olympia team. I remember my high school days as being the most influential in pushing me down one particular track (bio). It is likely that you are making a bigger impact than you think.

    Like

  2. Potnia Theron says:

    BME isn’t for everyone interested in biomed sci. In some places it can be very cut-throat and filled with aggressive pre-meds. It varies from place to place. Still the best is to try & find a match at the place you are.

    As for going back, of course you can. Its just not necessarily going to be easy. I’ve had older people come back to my lab.

    And… it is not a cop-out to chose something, for reasons that don’t necessarily align with the main flow of folks. I suspect your training has informed your teaching, and that doing what you did for a PhD makes you a better teacher.

    Like

  3. TheBioinfoPerson says:

    I’m a bioinformatics consultant now. My biology teacher in school was a botany graduate. She inspired at least 5-6 of our batch to take up botany in our undergrad. I’m forty years old. All of us went on to do different things in life. But I’m sure none of us can forget the curiosity and wonder, she inculcated in us.The research mindset and research career demands that one follows a specific path in a specific setup with nothing but high level research filling up your brain and time 24/7. For those who follow the research path, kudos to them-if it fulfils them and they can imagine nothing else for themselves. Yet any job or career is just a part of a whole, of the bigger picture of ourselves and our lives :). The science/research career is unique- opportunities are few, the right fit for your interests, skills, monetary needs/aspirations, personal situations is hard to find. You may find “your” niche after years of hanging in(http://blogs.nature.com/methagora/2015/07/a-physicists-adventures-in-biology-funding-and-job-hunting.html). You may decide to go in for an “alternative” path later. Meanwhile, why not enjoy life, keep building on your learning, networking on the slow burner. All works out!! For those (except yourself) who have ideas on why you did a PhD and what you should do after that,………….

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s